Books Comics

Star Wars: War of the Bounty Hunters IG-88 #1

Star Wars: War of the Bounty Hunters IG-88 #1
Zoom
More Info
Star Wars: War of the Bounty Hunters IG-88 #1
Zoom
More Info
Description

My Bounty for BFFC Members

Login to add to list, rate, and review

Save

Rate

Review

Login and add a rating before writing a review.
Save
Rate
Review

Description

Available October 27.

Written by RODNEY BARNES. Art by GUIU VILANOVA. Cover by Mahmud Asrar.

Boba Fett appears in this issue.

Variants:

Variant Cover by by CASPAR WIJNGAARD
Variant Cover by RAY-ANTHONY HEIGHT
Bounty Hunter Handbook Variant Cover RON FRENZ
Carbonite Variant Cover by MAHMUD ASRAR

NO ONE CAN DEFEAT IG-88! WAR OF THE BOUNTY HUNTERS TIE-IN!

IG-88 is an advanced assassin droid designed for death, destruction, and mayhem. Its weapons systems are unparalleled, its design flawless. Yet the galaxy's most sinister droid bounty hunter can still fail. What motivates IG-88's resurrection time and time again? Is it programming or something…more? And can IG-88 find a strategy to overcome its old foe, Boba Fett?! Rodney Barnes' and Guiu Vilanova's one-shot is the fourth of four action-packed "War of the Bounty Hunters" tie-ins about the criminal underworld's most notorious hunters and scoundrels, all told by the best STAR WARS writers and illustrators in the galaxy.




Stats

  • 1,093 views
  • Ranked #286 out of 406 in this category

Contributors

Want to improve this listing with something we've missed? Contact us and, if we include your update, we'll tag your BFFC username on here as a contributor.

Last Updated

October 19, 2021

Bounty ID

4007


Bounty by the Numbers

4,646 items in our database

43,510 saves by members

5,995 member ratings and reviews

2,545 direct links to buy merch

12,183 images of collectibles

1,738 members with lists


About This Feature

Bounty is our collectibles database for all official Boba Fett collectibles. Use My Bounty to easily keep track of what you have, want, and like. You can also add a review — with stars, words, or both. Are we missing something? Please let us know.