Geeki Tikis Boba Fett Mug
My Bounty for BFFC Members
Login to add to list, rate, and reviewSave
Rate
Review This
Login and add a rating before writing a review.Description
Re-pack of the 2016 version.
Holds 13 ounces.
Ceramic.
From the manufacturer:
THE ULTIMATE BOUNTY: The hunt is over, you've officially found the most valuable bounty in the galaxy, the Boba Fett Geeki Tikis mug! Enjoy this mug at the bar during all future bounty hunting contracts!
A FINE TROPHY FOR ANY COLLECTION: Tiki cups are a popular commodity among those who enjoy a fun and refreshing drink. With Boba Fett added to your Geeki Tikis stash, you'll have the coolest Star Wars cup collection around!
RATED FOR ALL BOUNTY HUNTER MISSIONS: This collectible tiki mug is crafted from durable ceramic and is built to last. At 13 ounces, Boba Fett is designed to keep you hydrated through any mission!
TAKE HOME THE MANDALORIAN: With a whole line of Geeki Tikis Star Wars characters, Boba Fett is just one way to quench your thirst in a fun galactic style. Collect your other favorite Star Wars characters for a complete set of Geeki Tikis drinking cups!
OFFICIAL GEEKI TIKIS CHARM: Each Geeki Tikis mug is designed to bring your favorite hobbies together; mixed drinks and Star Wars! This Boba Fett mug is officially licensed and perfect for any tiki mug collection!
NEW Additional Info
Retail Price
$25.99
Stats
- 620 views
- Ranked #170 out of 247 in this category
Contributors
We are currently beta testing our contributor system. Please contact us with your BFFC username to request early access.Last Updated
May 01, 2020Bounty ID #
34424,421 items in our database
40,346 saves by members
5,426 member ratings and reviews
2,239 direct links to get merch
11,323 images of collectibles
1,636 members with lists

2022 • The Vintage Collection (2010-Present)
More Info
About This Feature
Bounty is our collectibles database for all official Boba Fett collectibles. Use My Bounty to easily keep track of what you have, want, and like. You can also add a review — with stars, words, or both. Are we missing something? Please let us know.