Re: Boba and Jango, Side-by-Side
Hah Ha H a hhha Good One! ![]()
-Boba Fett-
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Hah Ha H a hhha Good One! ![]()
Are you guys crazy?
Jango's suit looks way better.
You guys know in ROTC and in any type of military you have to keep your outfit clean and nice.
Of course Jango was raised a true Mandalorian, to have respect with his equipment and take care of it.
While Boba has that ugly outfit, it shows you how lazy boba is.
Also, why dont you guys like it when Jango shows off?
I think its awsome, and it shows you how much of a badass he is, nothing wrong with showing off i say.
If Boba was lazy, he would have just retired with all the money he had, and not even bothered to hunt further. He was loaded.
No. Boba was anything but lazy especially considering how diligently he works.
@ what ralin wrote about editing RotJ:
Wow...that would of made SW retarded...I can understand that people didnt like boba death, but killing the whole point of SW in the first place seems a little drastic dont you think?
Last edited by Mandal_ShadowWarrior (Monday, November 3, 2008 3:31 pm)
Its not that he's lazy. His armour is in perfect working order, and he carefully repairs it when needed. He just keeps in the scraped paint and as many dents as he safely can to show his opponment (or merchandise) that no matter what anyone can throw at him, he will survive and come out on top.
I just say that Boba just doesn't really care about his apperance, just as long as he get's his cash.
Jango likes to stay shiny ( to impress the ladies) ![]()
Not that he was that popular with them...
(jk)
ya why else would he clone himself instead of gett'n married and have'n a few kids. ![]()
i suppose becasue by having a kid normaly would have added infieor DNA to his Son.
(not that it helped much
)
Last edited by Mandal_ShadowWarrior (Tuesday, November 4, 2008 5:26 pm)
hmm who know?
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 7 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.
Generated in 0.142 seconds, 10 queries executed