Jodo Kast 2K wrote:
Before everyone goes nuts on me, i will say the compareson of the 2.. YES ST has better Tech than SW. BUT the one thing ST don't have is fun,colorfull characters as SW. ST has a lot of dull characters. ST might have more women but in SW the women(leia) would kick there ass in a heart beat.
Star Trek does not have alot of dull characters. Most of the characters are more real than Star Wars characters. And I highly doubt that Leia could beat Seven, a borg woman from Star Trek who would destroy her. Also we can relate more to Star Trek since it is in our own galaxy and Star Fleet is from Earth. And how can you say Star Trek has dull characters? Each of the races in it have personality's and cultures of their own that are explored more and talked about more in Star Trek. The way humans run their lives are different from the Vulcans which are diffedrent from their cousins the Romulans. The Klingons have their own language that real nerds ACTUALLY LEARNED HOW TO SPEAK, similar to the Mandalorian language now being made.
Jesse Fett wrote:
What makes Star Wars so much better is well theres so many planets and the movies dont take place only on the ship. and on those planets theres cities full of life. On one star trek episode I saw they were in a bard and there was like 3 aliens and they were very bad actors.
I guarantee that there are more planets in the Star Trek universe than there are in the Star Wars universe. And the fact that the shows take place on one ship lets you become more familiar with the characters and relate to them better. Thats the type of show it is, following one band of explorers through the galaxy. And what you said about bad actors, Star Wars is complete with its own bad acting. Hayden Christenson (spelling)wasn't exactly an award winning preformance. Ppl think that you can easily compare and contrast Star Wars and Star Trek because their both in space and stuff, the truth is their both very different and cant be compared so easily. Ones a show and the other is a movie for instance. That makes a huge difference. In movies you must cram characters personality's in there to make space for the rest of the plot, however in shows you can sacrifice that because you have a hundred other shows in which the characters personality will be showed. Tech wise, it definitly goes to Star Trek. One word, REPLICATORS. You can create ANYTHING, which solves the problem of food, repair equipment, and anything else your heart desires. Next, Holodecks, not seen anywhere in Star Wars. The most Star Wars has is holograms where they are always blue and flickering. While in Star Trek you can creat whole worlds within the holodecks and they are increadibly realistic. Weaponry, Star wars' snub fighters stand no chance against the Enterprise. As shown in one of those VS youtube videos they are decimated by the ships Phasers and lock-on technology. The enterprises shields are also better than that of a Star Destroyer's as is the Warp drive. All Star Wars ships travel at lightspeed, however Star Trek ships travel at Warp speed which is much faster.Lightsabers however are something unseen in the Star Trek Universe but thats one thing, plus if they ever got their hands on a lightsaber and openedit, examined it then they could create one with the replicators. Phasers vs Blasters, I would have to say Star Trek's phasers are better because they do not require ammo and they have a kill setting with VAPORIZES you upon hit, much like Star Wars' disruptor however smaller, more tactical, and everyone on the Enterprise has one.
Est Sularus Oth Mithas
I am a Role Playing Gamer, like my father before me.