Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

I think that with flood, and Hunters, Spartans, and Elites, the Halo has way better infantry. Sure, SW has Mandos, but in the GCW era, they are so few. The ISDs and SSDs are very powerful, but the UNSC with the MACs, and the simply massive size of the Covenant fleet, Halo wins again. The Death Star is good too, but with enough heavy bombardment, or perhaps a precision strike by elite UNSC or Covenant forces would take it out.

"Some soldiers say that to reach maximum combat efficiency, they need to be in the zone. Sir; I live in the zone." - RC 1207 'Sev' to RC 1138 'Boss'

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

I solved this yesterday. I through a SW DVD at the Halo disc. The Halo disc broke. Star Wars wins.

take it easy baby take it as it comes

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

Fett_II wrote:

GCW era. death star = wins battle on coruscant.

You keep saying the Deathstar is the Empires super weapon and that it could wipe out a flood infected world like its the perfect solution. Here is a scenario = The flood get a few creatures down on a planet, and like a zombie infestation the world slowly starts to turn. The empire destroys it with a blast from the Death Star. Here's the outcomes I see from this...

1. If any type of evactuation was done to save the planet's inhabitants, the Flood could spread throughout the Star Wars planets easily. This would mean pretty much the end of every world that they evacuate to.

2. No Evacuation, the Empire just vaporizes the planet. Any general with half a brain on the Halo side realizes all they have to do is make it look like there is an infection on any planet and now the Death star is blowing up its own worlds left and right... or fear the death of their races.

3. They spend so much time and resources trying to defeat the infection and the Flood that they get blindsided by the UNSC and Covenant Fleet.

Oh and when worst comes to worst for the Halo side, they could just pull a MAD (mutually assured destruction) cease fire with the rings and the Ark.

Good... Bad... I'm the one with the gun.
Hail to the King Baby!!

29 (edited by Merciless Mandalore Monday, August 11, 2008 7:54 pm)

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

Very well said, Fetterthanyou.

Lol, Draco. But a waste of a good game nonetheless tongue .

"Some soldiers say that to reach maximum combat efficiency, they need to be in the zone. Sir; I live in the zone." - RC 1207 'Sev' to RC 1138 'Boss'

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

It wasn't mine, sono bid deal.

take it easy baby take it as it comes

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

hmmm a Boba Fett fan site lets see who would win hmmmm......I don't know maybe STAR WARS DUHHHH!!!!!

32 (edited by Adeptus_Astartes Monday, August 25, 2008 2:34 am)

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

vegetafett wrote:

hmmm a Boba Fett fan site lets see who would win hmmmm......I don't know maybe STAR WARS DUHHHH!!!!!

Wow, your reasoning there, totaly amazing. Not realy. Maybe if you thought a bit you would see how wrong you are. Potentialy. Starwars kind of has an advantage in space combat, but not so much on the land, and as Fetter said*,if your trying to knock a million fire ants off of you your not going to see the thousand wasps until its to late.

*sort of.

[i]The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed[/i]
[url=http://lfgcomic.com/page/1]Interrogations are hard...[/url]

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

Agreed. As far as SW having space superiority though, not sure. The Imperial Fleet is impressive, as are the Mon Cal cruisers, and the tactical fighters are far better in SW (X-Wing vs. Longsword), but the Pillar of Autumn is several kilometers long, and it is considered small for a human ship. Now consider the size of human ships to size of the Covie ships. The Covenant most likely has hundreds of ships that outclass the Executor or even the Malevolent. And has anyone played EAW? Remember the Mass Drivers that go straight through shields? That is all the UNSC uses (MAC guns), and nukes. So, aside from the Death Star and the rediculously sized Star Dreadnoughts (In my opinion too huge, there's got to be some physics consequences for that or something) Halo has the space battles all wrapped up. And, the Covenant most likely has a far larger fleet, counting the combined ships of the Brutes, Prophets, and Elites.

"Some soldiers say that to reach maximum combat efficiency, they need to be in the zone. Sir; I live in the zone." - RC 1207 'Sev' to RC 1138 'Boss'

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

I think that Star Wars would kick Halo's butt.

Carry on my wayward son!

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

Merciless Mandalore wrote:

Agreed. As far as SW having space superiority though, not sure. The Imperial Fleet is impressive, as are the Mon Cal cruisers, and the tactical fighters are far better in SW (X-Wing vs. Longsword), but the Pillar of Autumn is several kilometers long, and it is considered small for a human ship. Now consider the size of human ships to size of the Covie ships. The Covenant most likely has hundreds of ships that outclass the Executor or even the Malevolent. And has anyone played EAW? Remember the Mass Drivers that go straight through shields? That is all the UNSC uses (MAC guns), and nukes. So, aside from the Death Star and the rediculously sized Star Dreadnoughts (In my opinion too huge, there's got to be some physics consequences for that or something) Halo has the space battles all wrapped up. And, the Covenant most likely has a far larger fleet, counting the combined ships of the Brutes, Prophets, and Elites.

Actaully in the books the mac cannons weapons dont go through the sheilds.

[i]"Sir, Finishing this Cake."[/i]

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

Covenant shields, which are different then SW shields i bet

[i]The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed[/i]
[url=http://lfgcomic.com/page/1]Interrogations are hard...[/url]

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

The Death Star would just obliterate High Charity and when flood problems ebgin the death star could just blow the planet destroying the flood presence.

And Halo(the ring thing) has no defense without activation so it would just be a place for Death Star fire practice.

All that tose MAC guns would do is destroy  a few Star Destroyers and Star Destroyers have much heavier firepower than Pillar of Autumn type ships so...

And Coruscant would be to heavilly defended for invasion.


In short Star Wars wins

"My luck ranges from barely tolerable to cataclysmic"

38 (edited by Adeptus_Astartes Saturday, September 6, 2008 10:05 am)

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

You do know that the flood would just infect everything so then the deathstar would either, be useless or blow up every planet in the galaxy. if the rings were attacked then they would be fired.

[i]The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed[/i]
[url=http://lfgcomic.com/page/1]Interrogations are hard...[/url]

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

What if they can't find the index.


And if problems began on the Death Star they could just self destruct

"My luck ranges from barely tolerable to cataclysmic"

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

revan07 wrote:

What if they can't find the index.


And if problems began on the Death Star they could just self destruct

Which is of course a great tactic...

Good... Bad... I'm the one with the gun.
Hail to the King Baby!!

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

And what if somone acidentaly, oh i dont know, threw a grenade down the exausht vent?

[i]The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed[/i]
[url=http://lfgcomic.com/page/1]Interrogations are hard...[/url]

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

The grenad would explode before hitting the reactor. And its hard to throw a grenade in a space suit.

"I swear by the soul I don't have, I am going to kill you."
―Boba Fett

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

Well then it could be a remote charge

[i]The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed[/i]
[url=http://lfgcomic.com/page/1]Interrogations are hard...[/url]

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

Good point. I'm not sure who would win, since they're both great combatants, on all sides. The Covenant has ease with killing humans, and since humans are the majority of the Empire...and Rebellion...I don't know who would win.

"I swear by the soul I don't have, I am going to kill you."
―Boba Fett

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

and Star Wars could unleash their mass virus, which specifically kills all non-human creatures. and for the humans in halo, well they'd get destroyed very easily.

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

This is a very hard question. Don't forget about the non-humans in Star Wars, Such as the Iridonian Zabraks like Darth Maul. The Jedi who are alien would die too, but humans aren't a majority in Halo.

"I swear by the soul I don't have, I am going to kill you."
―Boba Fett

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

uh no it would be targeted against the Covenant and any other non-human factor in Halo...

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

It's kind of hard to control a virus

"I swear by the soul I don't have, I am going to kill you."
―Boba Fett

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

flood would probably be unaffected....

[i]The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed[/i]
[url=http://lfgcomic.com/page/1]Interrogations are hard...[/url]

Re: who would win, Halo or Star Wars

Mandalore Hunter wrote:

It's kind of hard to control a virus

not really. unless you're just unleashing it wherever.