Topic: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

Two Sith Lords. Both in their prime. Each has their own lightsaber. Who will win? Who will lose? Start voting!!! I personally think that Count Dooku would win.

"None of this is really happening. There is a man. With a typewriter. This is all part of his crazy imagination."

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

I say that Dooku would win. Obi-wan  killed Maul and he couldn't beat Dooku.

Don't drink at gay parties.

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

No way darth Maul woud win. He is younger, has more anger, and is quicker with a lightsaber.

there are no star systems slave 1 can't reach, and there's no planet I can't find. There's nowhere in the galaxy for you to run. Might as well give up now.    -Boba Fett

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

fett3393 wrote:

No way darth Maul woud win. He is younger, has more anger, and is quicker with a lightsaber.

Ah, but Count Dooku's mastery of the force is greater. Also, Makashe (Dooku's saber style) is the best style for lightsaber battles.

"None of this is really happening. There is a man. With a typewriter. This is all part of his crazy imagination."

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

si he is right amigo.

Don't drink at gay parties.

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

Why is no one else responding to my topic.......? sad

"None of this is really happening. There is a man. With a typewriter. This is all part of his crazy imagination."

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

1. It is new.
2. It takes a while to get a topic active.
3. Verses topics are not always the most active topic.

take it easy baby take it as it comes

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

I think Maul would win. He was so blinded by hate towards the Jedi so he made mistakes. I think he'd be more centred when taking on a fellow Sith.

(And Draco's correct, people don't necessarily visit the site everyday so replies can be slow - be patient and they will come) big_smile

BFFC Moderator
It was like thousands of voices cried out for a sequel and were suddenly silenced...

9 (edited by Thylacine Friday, January 5, 2007 3:03 am)

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

It all depends on the fight.

If they were fighting lightsaber-to-lightsaber, no Force Powers, Maul would definatly win. He's faster than Dooku, plus he has alot of anger to back him up.

Now, if they were fighting Force-to-Force, no lightsabers, then Dooku would win. He seems to have a better handle on the Force than Maul does.

"Did I ever tell you how much I like ants huh? Especially fried in a subtle blend of mech fluid and grated gears?"
-Rampage, Beast Wars

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

I would call them about equal.

I'm smiling because they havn't found the bodies yet. :)
I think, therfore i am I destroy, therfore i endure - IG-88 tales of the bounty hunters

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

Dooku he was better with the light sabre and more adept with the force than Maul.

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

wizardofcars wrote:

Dooku he was better with the light saber and more adept with the force than Maul.

He's right. Dooku kicks @$$! But Darth Maul is great, too. Anyone else want to reply? Without counting ties, the score is Dooku: 3 and Maul: 2. And Thylacine, in the battle Count Dooku and Maul can use both lightsabers and the Force.

"None of this is really happening. There is a man. With a typewriter. This is all part of his crazy imagination."

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

No Dooko is much more adept in the force and Thylacine didnt say Maul couldnt use the force. In my veiw Maul is a much more impressive lightsaber user espeshially those cool little filps he did when fighting Qui Gon and Obi Wan. So im not sure about a lightsaber battle but Dooko definatly has a greater knoledge of the force.

I'm smiling because they havn't found the bodies yet. :)
I think, therfore i am I destroy, therfore i endure - IG-88 tales of the bounty hunters

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

Maul would so get his but kicked because of: 1. count dooku is a longer trained jedi(corect me if im wrong) a master i think.
2.He is much faster and has higher force caipabilitys.

15 (edited by fett3393 Wednesday, January 10, 2007 4:15 pm)

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

kyale wrote:

2.He is much faster and has higher force capabilitys.

higher foce capabilities yes but Maul is much faster. It would depend on the situation. If they were fighting in open land and nothing around them(like Tattooine) Maul would win. But if they were fighting in a city or a closed space with stuff around them(like Coruscant) Dooku would win.

there are no star systems slave 1 can't reach, and there's no planet I can't find. There's nowhere in the galaxy for you to run. Might as well give up now.    -Boba Fett

16 (edited by draco fett Wednesday, January 10, 2007 4:36 pm)

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

Tyranus could hold his own against Yoda.

take it easy baby take it as it comes

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

IG-88 wrote:

No Dooko is much more adept in the force and Thylacine didnt say Maul couldnt use the force. In my veiw Maul is a much more impressive lightsaber user espeshially those cool little filps he did when fighting Qui Gon and Obi Wan. So im not sure about a lightsaber battle but Dooko definatly has a greater knoledge of the force.

I never said that Tylacine said that Maul couldn't use the force. Remember, Count Dooku is also a better lightsaber duelist than Maul is. Dooku can hold his own against Yoda like draco said, and Maul couldn't even beat Padawan Obi-Wan.

"None of this is really happening. There is a man. With a typewriter. This is all part of his crazy imagination."

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

Not like Obi wan wasnt a good Jedi and if you remember for the wholo of the battle it was 2 v 1 that would probably wear him down. We dont know how Maul would cope against Yoda.

I'm smiling because they havn't found the bodies yet. :)
I think, therfore i am I destroy, therfore i endure - IG-88 tales of the bounty hunters

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

IG-88 wrote:

Not like Obi wan wasnt a good Jedi and if you remember for the wholo of the battle it was 2 v 1 that would probably wear him down. We dont know how Maul would cope against Yoda.

Count Dooku fought Obi-Wan and Anakin on Geonosis and he still won, but Darth Maul lost against two jedi.

"None of this is really happening. There is a man. With a typewriter. This is all part of his crazy imagination."

20 (edited by IG-88 Friday, January 12, 2007 3:43 am)

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

Anakin and Obi wan didnt attack at the same time.

I'm smiling because they havn't found the bodies yet. :)
I think, therfore i am I destroy, therfore i endure - IG-88 tales of the bounty hunters

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

IG-88 wrote:

Anakin and Obi wan didnt attakc at the same time.

Only because Anakin is a complete idiot and he charged Dooku. Don't the Jedi Masters at the Temple teach the students about dark side powers like Force lightning and that if you ever face a Sith, make sure you don't charge them like your a friggin rhino?!

"None of this is really happening. There is a man. With a typewriter. This is all part of his crazy imagination."

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

I'm going to say Maul because he's a much better duelist and I think all those arobatic moves he throws in might throw off Dooku a bit.  He also is a juyo form master.  Although if you think about it this could go either way, because Dooku is more adept when using force and he taunts his victims which could definately lower your morale.

[i]Like I told your captain, the orphange attacked me.  It was self-defense.[/i]  -Richard the Warlock  [url]http://archive.lfgcomic.com/lfg0002.gif[/url]

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

Dooku can hold his own against the one of the greatest jedi of all time! there shouldn't even be a debate he, dooku would win. he has force lightning to stun his enemys. plus(and some will disagree) he is much faster, i mean did you see yoda! he was blur. maul would fall in an instant against yoda, so dooku would definatly win.

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

It may depend on the situation, but hardly.  Darth Tyranus would very quickly have killed Anakin and Obi-Wan had Yoda not arrived, and he very nearly killed him.  He was still not bested.  He was only killed when Sidious himself decided he no longer needed him, and no doubt aided Anakin to defeat him.  Darth Maul may be scarier at first, but then Tyranus is far more sinister and contemplative, and would laugh at Maul's ridiculously feeble attempt at intimidation.  Remember, Dooku was once a Jedi, while Maul, as far as we can tell, was not.  I do believe that Count Dooku would easily make rather short work of his more primal predecessor.

Re: Count Dooku vs. Darth Maul

JasterMereel wrote:

It may depend on the situation, but hardly.  Darth Tyranus would very quickly have killed Anakin and Obi-Wan had Yoda not arrived, and he very nearly killed him.  He was still not bested.  He was only killed when Sidious himself decided he no longer needed him, and no doubt aided Anakin to defeat him.  Darth Maul may be scarier at first, but then Tyranus is far more sinister and contemplative, and would laugh at Maul's ridiculously feeble attempt at intimidation.  Remember, Dooku was once a Jedi, while Maul, as far as we can tell, was not.  I do believe that Count Dooku would easily make rather short work of his more primal predecessor.

I rest my case! And Jasters.

"Everyone has the right to be stupid, but you are abusing the privilege."