Message Boards - Boba Fett Fan Club — Money 1st or love 1st

Re: Money 1st or love 1st

null@example.com (Master Fett) — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:27:26 +0000

Bad idea Karson. What happens if she forgets Her purse. Besides jokes like that always backfire

Re: Money 1st or love 1st

null@example.com (Mandal_ShadowWarrior) — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:25:29 +0000

If you ask me 'love' and 'feelings' are just as temporary and fleeting as money. They say money can't buy everything, maybe so if you dont use it right. But money is resources, and you can accomplish things with resources. Love just makes you feel good.

Having people act fake around you comes with the position you have but it's a small price to pay considering what a lot of people have underneath their mask. Use your money correctly and you'll be able to find out if she/he loves you or not. But don't regret having money just because you cant find Mr. or Misses. 'Right'. Don't sacrifice your lifestyle for someone else on the notion that they 'love' you.

Re: Money 1st or love 1st

null@example.com (Miba) — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:34:48 +0000

Not when it's about something big like money.

Re: Money 1st or love 1st

null@example.com (ZiviReywes) — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:59:48 +0000

Miba wrote:

Karson, that's a bad idea. The reaction to the event depends on the sort of person they are. I would be upset if f my husband, whom I love lots, "forgot his wallet". That doesn't mean I wouldn't love him. People can be upset and mad at each other and still love each other, it's normal. If I had "forgotten my wallet", he would have shrugged it off. Because I care more about money than he does. However, when the truth came out and the other learned that it had been a test, that's when the real fighting and trouble starts, and the reason behind the event is likely to break you up than the event itself.
You shouldn't have to test someone like that. If you (not you specifically, you in general) don't trust the other person enough that you have to resort to doing things like that then maybe there's something wrong with you, and not them.

Oh but it's okay when girls decide to test their men with silly things like that? Pffft.

Re: Money 1st or love 1st

null@example.com (Miba) — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:24:33 +0000

Karson, that's a bad idea. The reaction to the event depends on the sort of person they are. I would be upset if f my husband, whom I love lots, "forgot his wallet". That doesn't mean I wouldn't love him. People can be upset and mad at each other and still love each other, it's normal. If I had "forgotten my wallet", he would have shrugged it off. Because I care more about money than he does. However, when the truth came out and the other learned that it had been a test, that's when the real fighting and trouble starts, and the reason behind the event is likely to break you up than the event itself.

You shouldn't have to test someone like that. If you (not you specifically, you in general) don't trust the other person enough that you have to resort to doing things like that then maybe there's something wrong with you, and not them.

Re: Money 1st or love 1st

null@example.com (Karson Fett) — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:36:41 +0000

Here is something to do....take your "lover" out on a date to a expensive restaurant...let the person get what they and you hold back...get cheaper stuff...then when the check comes make like you forgot your wallet...then ask your "lover" if they would pay for it. If they don't really love you they will likely get mad and walk out...on you...if they really care, they will pay for it and not bother you about it.

Not that it will work. but its what I would do...

Re: Money 1st or love 1st

null@example.com (Sharra Fett) — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:31:29 +0000

Ideally, both, but if both is not possible love should always come first. Money is just a vehicle or an abstraction if you for getting the things that we need or want. Things alone cannot make us truly happy.

Re: Money 1st or love 1st

null@example.com (Master Fett) — Sat, 20 Feb 2010 22:54:44 +0000

Love first. Money second. But love and money would be nice. I am married so you got to know it isnt money. LOL

Re: Money 1st or love 1st

null@example.com (BFFC Admin) — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:37:50 +0000

Thanks!

I'm here almost every day. Been bulk-loading Bounty, Fettipedia and Image Galleries.

Re: Money 1st or love 1st

null@example.com (Regimas) — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:13:08 +0000

its nice to see more posts from the admin turnin up

Re: Money 1st or love 1st

null@example.com (BFFC Admin) — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:05:01 +0000

Regimas wrote:

didn't expect such a heartfelt response from the silent overlord
found someone have we?

Haha. I'll keep my private life private. But I love my day job.

Re: Money 1st or love 1st

null@example.com (CeciliaCrimsondragonFett) — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 05:44:08 +0000

That kind of love isn't true love, just love of money. When the money is gone, so is the "love". As for true love...if theres a better feeling then that, I've yet to have found it.

Re: Money 1st or love 1st

null@example.com (Regimas) — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 04:43:07 +0000

didn't expect such a heartfelt response from the silent overlord

found someone have we?

Re: Money 1st or love 1st

null@example.com (BFFC Admin) — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:21:42 +0000

Love conquers all. (Same can be said for happiness.)

Money is paper. And temporary.

Money 1st or love 1st

null@example.com (johnnyblame) — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:42:45 +0000

I m having just a question that i m from rich family and then also i don't have true love that's why im asking this question ...

everyone here has common sense that if we have money we will get love automatically ..... but its not like that its too hard to found true lover who does not loves our money they loves our feeling ....